<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rails vs Merb (updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.3hv.co.uk/blog/2008/11/18/rails-vs-merb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.3hv.co.uk/blog/2008/11/18/rails-vs-merb/</link>
	<description>precision engineering for your website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 00:39:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.3hv.co.uk/blog/2008/11/18/rails-vs-merb/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3hv.co.uk/blog/?p=320#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>Yjrwqg hi nice site thx http://peace.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yjrwqg hi nice site thx <a href="http://peace.com" rel="nofollow">http://peace.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahoul Baruah</title>
		<link>http://www.3hv.co.uk/blog/2008/11/18/rails-vs-merb/comment-page-1/#comment-1210</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahoul Baruah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3hv.co.uk/blog/?p=320#comment-1210</guid>
		<description>Thanks Matt (love your blog by the way).  

The issue is, as Zed states, that the entire &quot;discussion&quot; is conducted in a passive-aggressive manner.  It&#039;s not a &quot;I can see the merits in Y but in my experience X works better&quot;, it&#039;s more like &quot;Y is preferred by **some** [cue scornful voice] people but X is, as a matter of fact, the way it should be done&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Matt (love your blog by the way).  </p>
<p>The issue is, as Zed states, that the entire &#8220;discussion&#8221; is conducted in a passive-aggressive manner.  It&#8217;s not a &#8220;I can see the merits in Y but in my experience X works better&#8221;, it&#8217;s more like &#8220;Y is preferred by **some** [cue scornful voice] people but X is, as a matter of fact, the way it should be done&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Aimonetti</title>
		<link>http://www.3hv.co.uk/blog/2008/11/18/rails-vs-merb/comment-page-1/#comment-1200</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Aimonetti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3hv.co.uk/blog/?p=320#comment-1200</guid>
		<description>Good post, however I think people saw drama were there it was just people arguing ideas, see my response in my blog post: http://merbist.com/2008/11/15/rails-vs-merb-drama/

BTW when you see all the VM guys working together you can&#039;t pretend there is no love in the Ruby community ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, however I think people saw drama were there it was just people arguing ideas, see my response in my blog post: <a href="http://merbist.com/2008/11/15/rails-vs-merb-drama/" rel="nofollow">http://merbist.com/2008/11/15/rails-vs-merb-drama/</a></p>
<p>BTW when you see all the VM guys working together you can&#8217;t pretend there is no love in the Ruby community ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caius</title>
		<link>http://www.3hv.co.uk/blog/2008/11/18/rails-vs-merb/comment-page-1/#comment-1199</link>
		<dc:creator>Caius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.3hv.co.uk/blog/?p=320#comment-1199</guid>
		<description>Hear hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.191 seconds -->

